全英文注塑资料注塑机结构-动作-成型工艺..docx

The question of testing mould

1. Introduction
Injection moulding without rejects is the ideal moulders try to attain. This article describes two auxiliary devices that could increase the repeatability of an injection moulding machine. Once the optimum parameters are set, the physical dimensions, weight and other physical properties of the part will stay almost constant. The two devices do clamping force measurement/control and cavity pressure switchover to holding pressure.
For injection moulding of high precision optical parts, or parts with a high added value like appliance cases, the payoff of reduced rejects is high. Figure 1 shows the part weight distribution of quality moulding and suboptimal moulding. The nominal weight is 60 g, allowable deviation is +0.1 g and -0.05 g. The white cubes denote parts within the tolerance band.

Figure 1. Quality injection moulding and otherwise
2. Clamping force measurement/control
The clamping mechanism of injection moulding machines falls mainly into two categories: toggle and direct hydraulic. The former is more widely used; the latter has the property of automatic clamping force regulation. As a result, direct hydraulic clamp machine do not need clamping force measurement/control.
2.1 Toggle clamp
A 5-point double toggle clamp is shown in Figure 2. After amplification by the toggle mechanism, the clamping cylinder, attached to the tail platen, extends, pushing the moving platen to lock the mould halves together. We will investigate in various ways how the clamping force is generated.

Figure 2. The 5-point double toggles
2.2 Clamping force
At its simplest, the rated clamping force Fo is calculated according to the following formula.
Fo = Ps * A * M ------------------------------------------- (1)
where
Ps = system pressure,
A = clamping cylinder cross sectional area,
M = mechanical advantage of the toggles.
In most machines, M has a value of between 22 and 30. It is a function of the toggle dimensions and the stiffness of the toggles and tiebars.
2.3 Rated clamping force and adequate clamping force
The clamping force found in the specification table of an injection moulding machine is the rated clamping force Fo. By considering the various design parameters, the machine designer calculates it using formula (1).
In using an injection moulding machine, it is best to use the minimal but adequate clamping force F. An adequate clamping force holds the mould halves together against the cavity pressure during the injection phase.
An excessive clamping force distorts the mould and the mould cavity unnecessarily, affecting the precision of the moulded part. Furthermore, a high clamping force compresses the toggles and the mould, and stretches the tiebars, reducing the fatigue lives of the toggle pins, the mould and the tiebars.
2.4 Clamping force problem and solution
The problem with toggle clamped injection moulding machines is with only the hydraulic pressure meter available there is no way to set an accurate clamping force when the mould is installed and to maintain it constant during injection. As the mould heats up, it expands, increasing the clamping force. The solution is to attach a device to measure the clamping force and to control the clamping force to within a tolerance as mould temperature changes.
For the engineers, the following sections details how clamping force is generated. They also relate to the second device: switchover to holding pressure by cavity pressure measurement.
2.5 Mould height adjustment mechanism
Since not all moulds have the same mould height, a toggle clamped injection moulding machine has a mould height adjustment mechanism for that purpose. Basically, the tail platen is moved forward or backward so that with the toggles almost fully extended (q > 0) the mould halves just touch each other. At this time, the clamping force is zero. See Figure 3a.
To generate maximum clamping force (clamping force > 0) and to self lock, the toggles are fully extended (q = 0). This is done by extending the clamping stroke further and through the toggles, moves the moving platen forward by am, which is the amount by which the mould is compressed. At the same time, the tiebars, attached between the stationary and tail platens, are elongated by at. See Figure 3b. Self locking means even when the hydraulic pressure in the clamping cylinder is relieved, the clamping force is maintained. This could only be achieved when the toggles are fully extended.

Figure 3. Generation of clamping force
2.6 Revisiting clamping force
Assume the mould and the tiebars are in the elastic region at the rated clamping force. Their respective compression and elongation could be analysed using Figure 4.
In Figure 4a, at the adequate clamping force F, the mould is compressed by am and the tiebars elongated by at. Since the tiebars are long and thin, they are more flexible than the mould. Hence, the tiebars line is shallower. Technically speaking, Kt = tan at < Km = tan am. As an example, with clamping force measured in tonnes and elongation/compression measured in microns (1 micron = 0.001 mm), an injection moulding machine with 60 mm diameter tiebars has ato, a 300mm thick, 170 mm square steel mould has am = 64o. To facilitate the following analysis, the mould compression line is moved right to intersect the tiebars elongation line at F. See Figure 4b.

Figure 4. Clamping force analysis
When the melt is injected into the mould cavity, the clamping force is increased to F1. See Equation (2). In practice, this increase in clamping force could be observed by a clamping force measuring device. See Figure 5.

Figure 5. The effect of cavity pressure on clamping force
Figure 6 shows the free-body diagram of the mould halves with cavity pressure introduced. Each mould half is balanced by the force equilibrium
F1 = Fc + Fr ---------------------------------------------- (2)
where
Fc = cavity pressure force,
Fr = residual clamping force on the mould.

Figure 6. Free body diagram of mould halves
The cavity pressure force Fc offsets part of the clamping force F1, leaving only F1 - Fc to compress the mould. As a result, the mould compression is reduced from am to am'. The difference is taken up by the tiebars elongating more from at to at', increasing the clamping force to F1. See Figure 7.
The mould opening force Fc due to cavity pressure is seen between the tiebars line and the mould line. This is the graphical way of showing equation (2).

Figure 7. Adding cavity pressure
From Figures 3 and 7, one can see that the distance between the moving platen and the stationary platen is increased (by am - am') during injection. In practice, this could be measured by a dial gauge between the platens. In the extreme case when the cavity pressure is so high that the residual clamping force is reduced to zero, the mould opens and flashing occurs. At this point, the mould compression is zero, and cavity pressure force Fc = F2, the clamping force when flashing occurs. See the dashed line in Figure 7.
As an example, take F = 75 tonnes, the rated clamping force of Tat Ming ME75 III. For a 300 mm thick, 170 mm square steel mould, am = 0.037 mm. With such a mould mounted, the ME75 III toggle clamp will open at F2 = 81 tonnes, 6 tonnes above its rating. Everything else equal, an injection moulding machine with 50 mm diameter tiebars will open at F2 =78 tonnes, 3 tonnes above its rating.
As the mould heats up, it expands. The clamping force is increased as the mechanical interference is increased by the amount of the mould expansion. This is shown in Figure 8 in which the mould line is moved further right by the expansion, intersecting the tiebars line at a higher clamping force F". In this diagram, the tiebars are elongated more (at" - at ) and generated the additional clamping force F" - F.
To restore the clamping force, a mould height adjustment is made to restore the mould (now hot) compression to am before the next shot is injected. Such adjustment is clamping force control.
As an example, a 300 mm thick steel mould heated up by 10oC expands by 0.045 mm. On the ME75 III injection moulding machine, the increase in clamping force is 7.3 tonnes, which is almost 10% of the rated clamping force.

Figure 8. Mould expansion increases clamping force
2.7 No problems with hydraulic clamp
For the sake of comparison, let us do a similar analysis for a hydraulic clamp machine.
The adequate clamping force is
F = P * A -------------------------------------------------- (3)
where
P = the clamping pressure,
A = the clamping cylinder cross sectional area.
Clamping force is easily set as it is proportional to P, which, nowadays, is set through a proportional pressure valve. Mould height adjustment is done by extending or retracting the clamping cylinder rod to accommodate different mould heights. When the mould heats up and expands, it simple pushes the clamping cylinder rod back into the cylinder, but does not increase clamping force. In other words, the clamping mechanism has the automatic regulation property. Clamping force measurement and control is not necessary.
2.8 The clamping force measuring device
Since fast response is not needed, a strain gauge-based device is sufficient to measure and control clamping force. The simplest means is a strain gauge attached to the tail or stationary platen, which deflects under the clamping force.
Alternatively, a strain gauge is attached to a tiebar which extends as the mould is locked. An assumption is made that the tiebars are evenly stretched which may not be true if the mould faces are not parallel, the mould cavity is not symmetrical or the tiebars are not balanced out of the factory.
The strain gauge output is amplified and digitally displayed. The display is calibrated to read in tons. Such a device is sufficient to help the operator set up an adequate clamping force initially (during mould height adjustment). When for example a 5% deviation from the initial clamping force is detected (after the mould is closed but before injection), the operator could do a mould height adjustment to restore the clamping force to its original value.
Alternatively, the computer in the injection moulding machine could set up the clamping force during the initial mould height adjustment, and to restore the clamping force by another mould height adjustment when a prescribed deviation is detected.
3. Injection
The injection of melt into the mould cavity is made up of three phases: the filling phase, the packing phase and the holding phase.
The injection phases could be vividly illustrated using the cavity pressure curve. Figure 9 shows the ideal curve which is achieved when the switchover to holding pressure is optimum. The switchover is sometimes called velocity to pressure transfer, where velocity refers to injection velocity and pressure to holding pressure.

Figure 9. Ideal cavity pressure curve
The filling phase starts at 1. In the filling phase, the melt is injected into the cavity at a certain velocity. At 2, the melt reaches the cavity pressure sensor. Due to the viscosity of the melt, pressure starts to rise. The cavity is volumetrically filled at 3. Further screw advance compresses the melt up to 4 when the machine switches from injection pressure to the much lower holding pressure. At the holding phase, the low holding pressure incrementally fills the cavity as the part cools to compensate for the shrinkage. At 5, the sprue gate is frozen and the holding pressure could be removed (and the mould could be opened). 1-2-3 makes up the filling phase. 3-4 is the packing phase. 4-5 is the holding phase. Further cooling occurs in 5-6.
3.1 Overpacking and underpacking
An overpacked cavity pressure curve is shown in Figure 10b. It is characterized by a pressure peak in the packing phase. The pressure peak is caused by the delay in switchover to holding pressure, so the high injection pressure is still applied after volumetric filling. The pressure peak is relieved at the switchover to the lower holding pressure. Here lies an often overlooked cause of flashing which is easily detected if one has cavity pressure sensing.

Figure 10. Underpacked and overpacked cavity curves
Refer to Equation (2) or Figure 7. The momentary cavity pressure peak could produce a momentary Fc big enough to reduce the residual clamping force Fr to zero, causing the mould to open and the part to flash. To remove the flashing, the straight forward thinking would be to increase the clamping force. Reaching the limit of the machine rated clamping force, one would even move the mould to a bigger machine. Even if the increased clamping force overcomes flashing, overpacking adds weight and stress to the part and makes the part more difficult to demould. An alternative is to reduce the injection pressure. Too low an injection pressure causes defects such as sink marks. In actuality, the problem is easily and better solved by switching over earlier to get back to the ideal cavity pressure curve. In precision injection moulding, overpacking creates a reject.
An underpacked curve is shown in Figure 10a. It is characterized by a pressure dip in the packing phase. The switchover occurs too early, before the cavity is volumetrically filled. Part of the filling takes place at the lower holding pressure. Subsequently, the screw advance increases the pressure. The part has reduced dimensions, is underweight, has sink marks and surface marks. It is again a reject.
A device that switches over at volumetric filling would avoid the problems of overpacking and underpacking and produces the ideal cavity pressure curve. Switching is initiated at point 3 and completed in point 4 in Figure 9.
3.2 Methods of switchover
The available means to switchover in a modern injection moulding machine, in increasing order of accuracy, are
1. injection time,
2. screw position,
3. hydraulic pressure,
4. nozzle pressure,
5. cavity pressure.
3.2.1 Injection time switchover
Temperature affects the viscosity of the melt, which presents resistance to the advance of the screw. Increased resistance slows down the screw and prevents the cavity from filling in the given injection time. On the other hand, reduced resistance would lead to overpacking. Injection time switchover is the only means available in injection moulding machines without screw position and pressure sensors.
3.2.2 Screw position switchover
Screw position switchover is not affected by temperature nor viscosity. This is the preferred method in machines with screw position potentiometer. Like injection time switchover, screw position switchover could be considered open-loop as screw position is not a direct measure of volumetric filling. A leaky nozzle misleads the machine computer into switching over before the cavity is filled. So could a worn screw valve and a worn injection cylinder