昆明理工大学平台作业(三).doc

Part One Building Up Your Vocabulary and Grammar
1.        The politician's actions do not with the promises in his speeches. [1].
A. persist B. insist C. exist D. consist
2.        But gradually, as years went by, her image began to from his memory. [2].
A. diminish B. shrink C. fade D. vanish
3.        I wouldn't my job for anything because I enjoy it so much. [3].
A. substitute B. replace C. trade D. mortgage
4.        I would not give my consent to his brother, nor yet give him a flat denial, but that I would hold him in a while. [4].
A. regard B. suspense C. contempt D. response
5.        Although we tried to concentrate on the lecture, we were by the noise from the next room. [5].
A. discouraged B. dismissed C. distracted D. discharged
6.        She should know to poke the animal with her umbrella. [6].
A. worse than B. better than C. more than D. less than
7.        The television station apologized for the , which was due to bad weather conditions. [7].
A. reference B. inference C. conference D. interference
8.        This has been a timely reminder of the need for care. [8].
A. continual B. consecutive C. excessive D. constant
9.        He shows ability in solving problems. [9].
A. especial B. exclusive C. exceptional D. extra
10.    The president was so young that he was to some of his employees. [10].
A. senior B. prior C. superior D. junior
11.    She prided herself on nothing more than her talent observation. [11].
A. in B. for C. on D. with
12. Thus man was as a rational being, as a social animal, an animal that can make tools, or a symbol-making animal. [12].
A. defined B. confined C. refined D. enhanced
13. My father seemed to be in no to look at my school report. [13].
A. appetite B. spirit C. mood D. temper
14. Very few restaurant menus have translations, and multilingual waiters, bank clerks and policemen are . [14].
A. bare B. rare C. scarce D. lacking
15. The searching has down to a few streets where the gunman might be hiding. [15].
A. reduced B. decreased C. dropped D. narrowed
 Part Two Fast Reading
The Disappearing Generation Gap

By Marilyn Gardner
Sometimes, when Tom Krattenmaker and his 16-year-old daughter, Holland, listen to rock music together and talk about pop culture – interests they both enjoy – he recalls his more-distant relationship with his parents when he was a teenager.
"I would never have said to my mom, 'Hey, the new Weezer album is really great – how do you like it?' " says Mr. Krattenmaker, of Yardley, Pa. "There was just a complete gap in sensibility and taste, a virtual gulf."
Music was not the only gulf. From clothing and hairstyles to activities and expectations, earlier generations of parents and children often appeared to revolve in separate orbits.
Today, the generation gap has not disappeared, but it is shrinking in many families. The old authoritarian approach to discipline – a starchy "Because I said so, that's why" – is giving way to a new egalitarianism and a "Come, let us reason together" attitude.
The result can be a rewarding closeness among family members. Conversations that would not have taken place a generation ago – or that would have been awkward, on subjects such as sex and drugs – now are comfortable and common. And parent-child activities, from shopping to sports, involve an easy camaraderie that can continue into adulthood.
No wonder greeting cards today carry the message, "To my mother, my best friend."
But family experts caution that the new equality can also have a downside, diminishing respect for parents.
"There's still a lot of strict, authoritarian parenting out there, but there is a change happening," says Kerrie Laguna, a mother of two young children and a psychology professor at Lebanon Valley College in Annville, Pa. "In the middle of that change, there is a lot of confusion among parents."
Family researchers offer a variety of reasons for these evolving roles and attitudes. They see the 1960s as a benchmark. Dramatic cultural shifts led to more open communication and a more democratic process that encourages everyone to have a say.
"My parents were on the 'before' side of that shift, whereas today's parents, the 40-somethings, were on the 'after' side," explains Krattenmaker, news director at Swarthmore College. "It's much easier for 40-somethings and today's teenagers to relate to one another. It's not a total cakewalk for parents these days, because life is more complicated, but [sharing interests] does make it more fun to be a parent now."
Parents and children as friends
"Fun" is, in fact, a word heard far more frequently in families today than in the past, when "duty" and "responsibility" were often operative words.
Parents today are more youthful in appearance and attitudes. From blue jeans to blow-drys, their clothes and hairstyles are more casual, helping to bridge the sartorial divide. Those who are athletically inclined also enjoy Rollerblading, snowboarding, and rock-climbing with their offspring.
For the past three years, Kathy and Phil Dalby of Arnold, Md., have spent at least one evening a week, and sometimes two, at a climbing gym with their three children. "It's great to be able to work together," Mrs. Dalby says. "We discuss various climbs and where the hard parts are. Sometimes that leads to other conversations, and sometimes it doesn't. We're definitely closer."
A popular movement with roots in the 1970s, parent effectiveness training, has helped to reshape generational roles. The philosophy encourages children to describe their feelings about various situations. As a result, says Robert Billingham, a family-studies professor at Indiana University, "Parents and children began talking to each other in ways they had not before."
On the plus side, he adds, these conversations made parents realize that children may have important thoughts or feelings that adults need to be aware of.
But Professor Billingham also sees a downside: Many parents started making decisions based on what their child wanted. "The power shifted to children. Parents said, 'I have to focus on making my child happy,' as opposed to 'I have to parent most appropriately.' "
Other changes are occurring as the ranks of working mothers grow. An increase in guilt on the part of busy parents makes them less eager to spend time disciplining, says Dr. Laguna of Lebanon Valley College.
Time-short parents also encourage children's independence, making them more responsible for themselves. "They'll say, 'We trust you to make the right decisions' [whether they're ready to assume the responsibility or not]," says Billingham.
The self-esteem movement of the past quarter-century has also affected family dynamics. Some parents worry that if they tell their child no, or impose limits, it will hurt the child's self-esteem.
Yet, parents who don't set rules risk becoming "so powerless in their own homes that they feel out of control and sometimes afraid," cautions Dennis Lowe, director of the Center for the Family at Pepperdine University in Malibu, Calif.
He believes that parents – in their eagerness to keep the peace and avoid arguments – miss an opportunity to teach children how to resolve conflicts, rather than simply avoiding them.
Although sensitive and democratic parenting has its advantages, Laguna expresses concern about "almost epidemic numbers" of children who have few boundaries or expectations.
Dr. Lowe and his wife, Emily, try to maintain structure and boundaries by taking a traditional approach with their children, ages 10 and 14. They also strive for a united front. Challenges arise, he says, when one parent wants an egalitarian relationship with a child, while the other parent wants to set limits.
"Probably the democratic approach is not bad in and of itself," Lowe says. "It's when it swings so far that it promotes lack of rules and structure and discipline for children. Problems also arise when it promotes overindulgence, sometimes in an effort to avoid 'harming' the relationship, rather than teaching children moderation and the limits of life."
Overindulgence, Lowe says, can actually be a sign of neglect – neglecting values, neglecting teaching opportunities, and neglecting the relationship. To be successful, people need an appreciation for rules and limits.
To give their own children that appreciation, the Lowes discuss everything from the kind of movies the children can watch to what is realistic financially.
Lowe sees some parents trying to cultivate friendship with their children even at very early ages. And he knows families where children call parents by their first names. "Rather than 'Mom' or 'Dad,' you have a 7-year-old saying, 'Hey, Gary,' " he explains, adding that a lack of respect for parents could carry over into relationships with teachers, bosses, and others in positions of authority.
Growing understanding
Still, encouraging signs exist. Vern Bengtson, who has studied generational changes as coauthor of a forthcoming book, "How Families Still Matter," finds a greater tolerance for divergence between generations today than in the past.
"Because of my own rebellion in the '60s, and because of the way I grew out of it, I can better accept my son's desire for independence and the crazy and sometimes rebellious things that he does," says Professor Bengtson of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. "Based on my experience, he, too, will grow out of it."
As Dalby, the rock-climbing mom, looks around at friends and acquaintances, she is heartened to find that many people are far more open with the things they talk about with children. "There are a lot more dangers out there now. It's better to address them yourselves, because somebody will."
Where do families go from here?
"Parents have to be careful not to totally be their kid's buddy, because they still have to be the authoritarian and disciplinarian," Krattenmaker says.
For her part, Laguna would like to see role distinctions that illustrate clearly who the adults are.
"I don't think we're swinging back to the 'good old days,' when parents ruled and children kept their mouth[s] shut," Billingham says. "We're swinging toward a balance, where parents once again are viewed as parents, and not as peers to their children. Children are being viewed as very loved and valued family members, but without the power or authority of the parents.
"If we can get this balance, where parents are not afraid to be parents, and parents and children put the family as their priority, we'll be in great shape. I'm very optimistic about the future." (1357 words)
16. Earlier generations of parents and children are characterized by _________. [16].
A. lack of communication B. mutual understanding
C. fierce competition D. active cooperation
17. According to family experts, the new equality emerging in many families can_______. [17].
A. do more good than harm B. do more harm than good
C. be neither good nor bad D. carry both benefits and risks
18. By saying “today’s parents, the 40-year-olds, were on the ‘after’ side.” the author means that today’s parents _________. [18].
A. follow the trend of the change
B. can set a limit to the change
C. fail to take the change seriously
D. have little difficulty adjusting to the change
19. The disadvantage of parent effectiveness training in the 1970s lies in _________. [19].
A. the sewing divide between parents and children
B. the imbalance between children’s needs and parents’ power
C. the hostility between parents and children
D. the fight for power between parents and children
20. According to Dennis Lowe, parents should . [20].
A. bring their children under control
B. avoid conflicts with their children
C. leave their children alone
D. set rules for their children
21. In dealing with their children, Dr. Lowe and his wife are sometimes . [21].
A. in disagreement B. in harmony C. in unison D. in danger
 22. The purpose of the passage is to _________. [22].
A. describe the difficulties today’s parents have met with
B. discuss the development of the parent—child relationship
C. suggest the ways to handle the parent—child relationship
D. compare today’s parent—child relationship with that in the past
 Part Three
Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked [A], [B], [C] and [D]. You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.

Passage One
Questions 23 to 27 are based on the following passage.
It is natural for young people to be critical of their parents at times and to blame them for most of the misunderstandings between them. They have always complained, more or less justly, that their parents are out of touch with modern ways; that they are possessive and dominant; that they do not trust their children to deal with crises; that they talk too much about certain problems-and that they have no sense of humor, at least in parent-child relationships.
I think it is true that parents often misunderstand their teenage children and also forget how they themselves felt when young.
Young people often anger their parents with their choices in clothes and hairstyles, in entertainers and music. This is not their intention. They feel cut off from the adult world into which they have not yet been accepted. So they create a culture and society of their own. Then, if it turns out that their music or entertainers or vocabulary or clothes or hairstyles anger their parents, this gives them additional enjoyment. They feel they are superior, at least in a small way, and that they are leaders in style and taste.
Sometimes you are resistant and proud because you do not want your parents to approve of what you do. If they do approve, it looks as if you are betraying your own age group. But in that case, you are assuming that you are the underdog: you can't win but at least you can keep your honor. This is a passive way of looking at things. It is natural enough after long years of childhood, when you were completely under your parents' control. But this way of looking at things ignores the fact that you are now beginning to be responsible for yourself. If you plan to control your life, co-operation can be part of that plan. You can charm others, especially your parents, into doing things the way you want. You can impress others wit